FDA Panel Supports Anemia Drugs for Cancer Patients

But adds strong caveats on their use for some undergoing chemo

By Steve Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

Related Encyclopedia • Acidophilus • Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Brain Metastases • Amenorrhea • Amniocentesis More... Related Healthscout Videos New Frontiers in Fertility Complementary Cancer Care A Welcome Message from Survivor PJ Hamel Smother Says "Cut!" More... Related Animations • Breast Reduction • Breast Self-Exam Video • Colon Cancer • Erectile Dysfunction More... Related Drug Information • Actonel • Detrol LA • Diflucan • Ditropan XL More... Related News Articles • School Lunches Too Fatty and Sugary, Critics Say • Ethnicity May Drive Response to Obesity, Insulin Resistance • Half of Black Teens May Be Vitamin D Deficient • Doc-Patient Relationship May Be Key to Quality More...

THURSDAY, March 13 (HealthDay News) -- A U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted Thursday to recommend continued use of blood-boosting drugs for cancer patients on chemotherapy, with the caveat that some cancer sufferers should steer clear of the medications.

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 13-1 for letting Amgen Inc. continue selling Epogen and Aranesp and Johnson & Johnson continue selling Procrit, according to the Wall Street Journal. But it also voted 11-2 to recommend against the drugs' use for cancer patients who are likely to be cured. And, in a 9-5 vote, the panel recommended the drugs not be used in patients with breast or head and neck cancer.

Text Continues Below

---

FDA briefing documents filed this week before the meeting showed there are eight clinical trials that now suggest these widely used medications actually speed the growth of tumors and shorten the lives of cancer victims. Known as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), they work by stimulating red blood cell production.

"Whereas at the time of approval safety concerns were theoretical, there is now mounting evidence of documented effects on survival, tumor progression, and thrombotic events which require a re-assessment of the net benefits of this class of drugs," FDA officials stated in the documents. "Based on data provided to FDA, there is no evidence that ESAs improve quality of life or cancer outcomes."

Reaction to the advisory recommendation was immediate.

"The panel based its decision on data that weren't statistically significant," said Dr. Samuel M. Silver, a spokesman for the American Society of Hematology. "The decisions were not based on hard science. There really wasn't any new information to change anything right now."

This issue is being driven by the fact that these are not primary therapy drugs, Silver said. "In addition, there is a feeling that they don't need the same level of evidence to look at adjunctive therapy as they do primary treatment drugs," he added.

Page:  1 | 2 | 3 | Next >>