Search
Powered By HealthLine
Special Offers
Health Tools
 Heart Healthy Diet
 Ideal Body Weight Calculator
 Diet Reviews
 Fitness and Family
 Quiz: Test Your Fitness IQ
 Exercise and Fitness Guide
 Eat Out Smart
 Healthy Cooking
 BMI Calculator
Featured Conditions
 Diet & Exercise
 Stop Smoking
 Food & Fitness
 High Blood Pressure
 Cholesterol
 Heart
Resources
Healthscout News
3D Health Animations
Health Videos
Quizzes & Tools
Health Encyclopedia
In-Depth Reports
Library & Communities
News Archive
Drug Library
Find a Therapist
Enter City or Zip Code:
Powered by Psychology Today
PR Newswire
 Read latest







Channels
Home |  Today | Women| Men| Kids| Seniors| Diseases| Addictions| Sex & Relationships| Diet, Fitness, Looks| Alternative Medicine| Drug Checker
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Worth the Cost: Study

But authors admit the data is sketchy and the shot proves more expensive for older women

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter


Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Brain Metastases
Amenorrhea
Amniocentesis
Amniocentesis and CVS
More...

Related Healthscout Videos
 border=
High Energy Beauty..
Silent Killer
Urgent Matters
Brainy Baby
More...

Related Animations
 border=
Breast Reduction
Breast Self-Exam Video
Colon Cancer
Erectile Dysfunction
More...

Related Drug Information
 border=
Actonel
Detrol LA
Diflucan
Ditropan XL
More...

Related News Articles
 border=
If Baby Is Breech, Technology Might Help
Health Tip: Eating Right While You're Pregnant
Many Opt for Surgery to Lower Breast, Ovarian Cancer Risk
Drinking Moderately or More Ups Men's Cancer Risk
More...

WEDNESDAY, Aug. 20 (HealthDay News) -- Vaccinating all 12-year-old girls against the virus that causes cervical cancer, along with "catch-up" immunizations of women under the age of 21 and revised screening guidelines, would be cost-effective ways to combat the disease, a new study by Harvard researchers suggests.

But this conclusion, published in the Aug. 21 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, is based on computer modeling rather than "real world" data, leading some experts, including the authors of a related editorial, to question the advisability of implementing widespread vaccination programs.

Text Continues Below



"For this generation of teenagers, we're not going to have data for the next 15 or 20 years on how effective it [a cervical cancer vaccine] is, what it changes about the dynamics of cervical cancer, how long the vaccine lasts, whether you can then extrapolate this to decreasing screening guidelines," said Dr. Jennifer Wu, an obstetrician/gynecologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "We need more long-term data from this generation of girls getting vaccinates now [to] make decisions on a population basis."

The study data may also not be relevant to individual patients -- for example, a 28-year-old woman who has not yet become sexually active, Wu said.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer. Three-quarters of U.S. women will be exposed to HPV at some point in their lifetime and, at any one time, one-quarter have been infected.

Two strains of HPV -- HPV-16 and HPV-18 -- cause roughly 70 percent of cervical cancer cases worldwide. HPV also causes 90 percent of anal cancers, 40 percent of vulvar and vaginal cancers, and 3 percent of oral cancers.

The first vaccine against the virus, Gardasil, was approved in 2006. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends that 11- and 12-year-old girls be targeted for this vaccine, as most girls of this age are not yet sexually active, have not yet been exposed to HPV, and will therefore achieve maximum protection.

Page:  1 | 2 | Next >>

Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 8/20/2008

Related Links
 border=
From Healthscout's partner site on breast cancer, MyBreastCancerNetwork.com
VIDEO: Chemo booster cuts treatment time by two months
SYMPTOMS: Learn what to look for and what the symptoms mean
PROGNOSIS: Early detection and new treatments improve survival rates





SOURCES: Jane J. Kim, Ph.D., assistant professor of health decision science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Jennifer Wu, M.D., obstetrician/gynecologist, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Aug. 21, 2008, New England Journal of Medicine


About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001-2009. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy: Updated as of April 1, 2009  Terms of Service   Site Map
Advertising Policy