Search
Powered By HealthLine
Special Offers
Health Tools
 Heart Healthy Diet
 Ideal Body Weight Calculator
 Diet Reviews
 Fitness and Family
 Quiz: Test Your Fitness IQ
 Exercise and Fitness Guide
 Eat Out Smart
 Healthy Cooking
 BMI Calculator
Featured Conditions
 Diet & Exercise
 Stop Smoking
 Food & Fitness
 High Blood Pressure
 Cholesterol
 Heart
Resources
Healthscout News
3D Health Animations
Health Videos
Quizzes & Tools
Health Encyclopedia
In-Depth Reports
Library & Communities
News Archive
Drug Library
Find a Therapist
Enter City or Zip Code:
Powered by Psychology Today
PR Newswire
 Read latest







Channels
Home |  Today | Women| Men| Kids| Seniors| Diseases| Addictions| Sex & Relationships| Diet, Fitness, Looks| Alternative Medicine| Drug Checker
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Supreme Court Rejects Limits on Drug-Injury Lawsuits


Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Animal Bites
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
Arthritis
Arthroscopy & Arthroscopic Surgery
More...

Related Healthscout Videos
 border=
Pig Parts Heal Humans
Custom Ankle Replacements
Custom Ankle Replacements
Custom Ankle Replacements
More...

Related Drug Information
 border=
Ultram
Vioxx
More...

Related News Articles
 border=
Girl Softball Players Suffering More Shoulder Injuries
Heel-First Walking Conserves Energy
Research Sheds Light on Increasing Cerebral Palsy Rates Among Preemies
Fitness a Factor in Snow Shoveling Injuries
More...


Page:  << Prev | 1 | 2

The high court's decision is likely to unleash a torrent of similar lawsuits around the country.

"The court opinion not only declined to tell pharmaceutical companies that they could have this kind of immunity, it, in fact, pushed somewhat in the other direction," said Benjamin C. Zipursky, professor of law at Fordham Law School in New York City and visiting professor at Harvard Law School in Boston.

"Some trial lawyers who had been hesitant to bring claims against pharmaceutical companies are now going to be more willing to do so," Zipursky said. "A number of cases that were stayed in state and federal court pending this decision will now go forward and go forward with a more plaintiff-oriented posture. This is going to change the balance of incentives for lawyers who are thinking about suing pharmaceutical companies to make them more willing to sue and make trial judges and appellate courts less willing to throw out weak cases."

Text Continues Below



Wolfman added: "In general, it's going to mean that these claims are not pre-empted and that people with drug and injury claims are going to be able to sue for damages and get to a jury and, if the jury agrees, be compensated for that."

The high court's 6-3 decision essentially upended moves by the Bush administration to protect drug makers from lawsuits as long as the product was FDA-approved.

Many watchers had predicted that the court would decide the other way, Zipursky said.

"It was a surprise in two respects," he said. People had believed "that whatever the court did, it would rule narrowly and, in fact, the decision is quite broad."

More information

To learn more about the case, visit the U.S. Supreme Court.

Page:  << Prev | 1 | 2

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 3/4/2009

Related Links
 border=
From Healthscout's partner site on diet & exercise, MyDietExercise.com
QUIZ: What's your ideal body weight?
QUIZ: Check your body mass index (BMI) online!
QUIZ: Rate your carbohydrate intake





SOURCES: Brian Wolfman, director, litigation group, Public Citizen, Washington, D.C.; Benjamin C. Zipursky, J.D., Ph.D., professor of law, Fordham Law School, New York City, and visiting professor, Harvard Law School, Boston; March 4, 2009, prepared statement, PhRMA; March 4, 2009, press conference, Diana Levine, Vermont


About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001-2010. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy: Updated as of April 1, 2009  Terms of Service   Site Map
Advertising Policy