Search
Powered By HealthLine
Special Offers
Health Tools
 Heart Healthy Diet
 Ideal Body Weight Calculator
 Diet Reviews
 Fitness and Family
 Quiz: Test Your Fitness IQ
 Exercise and Fitness Guide
 Eat Out Smart
 Healthy Cooking
 BMI Calculator
Featured Conditions
 Diet & Exercise
 Stop Smoking
 Food & Fitness
 High Blood Pressure
 Cholesterol
 Heart
Resources
Healthscout News
3D Health Animations
Health Videos
Quizzes & Tools
Health Encyclopedia
In-Depth Reports
Library & Communities
News Archive
Drug Library
Find a Therapist
Enter City or Zip Code:
Powered by Psychology Today
PR Newswire
 Read latest







Channels
Home |  Today | Women| Men| Kids| Seniors| Diseases| Addictions| Sex & Relationships| Diet, Fitness, Looks| Alternative Medicine| Drug Checker
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Old, New Pap Methods Equally Good, Dutch Study Finds

But U.S. expert predicts 'major change' in testing methods in a few years

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter


Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Brain Metastases
AIDS and HIV Infection
Amenorrhea
Amniocentesis
More...

Related Healthscout Videos
 border=
Optimistic Healing
Early Babies: How Soon is Too Soon?
Aqua Lipo
Cancer Treatment for Any Size
More...

Related Animations
 border=
Breast Reduction
Breast Self-Exam Video
Colon Cancer
Erectile Dysfunction
More...

Related Drug Information
 border=
Actonel
Cialis
Detrol LA
Diflucan
More...

Related News Articles
 border=
Diet Soda and Salt: Destroying your Kidneys?
Folate Levels in Pregnancy Tied to ADHD in Offspring
CDC Study Links 2 Antibiotics to Birth Defects
Switch to 'Light' Cigarettes Makes Quitting Tougher
More...

TUESDAY, Oct. 27 (HealthDay News) -- Traditional Pap tests and the newer liquid-based cytology are equally reliable in screening for cervical cancer, a new study has found.

In the United States, liquid-based cytology testing has all but replaced the traditional Pap test, but in Europe the debate continues over which method is best, according to Dr. Mark Schiffman, a senior investigator at the U.S. National Cancer Institute, co-author of an editorial accompanying the study's publication in the Oct. 28 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Text Continues Below



The study's lead researcher, Albertus G. Siebers, from Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre in the Netherlands, reflects that debate. "Liquid-based cytology is neither more sensitive nor more specific in detecting cancer," he said. "However, the decision to convert to liquid-based cytology cannot be based on the performance of the method alone, as other arguments also play an important role."

The difference between the two tests is not in the way samples are collected but in how they are treated in the laboratory. In a traditional Pap test, cells are collected and smeared on a slide for evaluation. In liquid-based cytology, the cells are rinsed in a vial of preservation solution.

The advantage of liquid-based cytology is that it also screens for human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes most cervical cancers.

To find out which test was best, the researchers randomly assigned 89,784 women who participated in the Dutch cervical screening program to have either a traditional Pap tests or a liquid-based cytology test.

"The main finding of the study is that we provided strong evidence that a relatively new screening method is not necessarily better than the old way of screening with conventional PAP smears," Siebers said.

The Dutch screening program did not allow use of liquid-based cytology testing until recently, he said, because officials did not have sufficient data comparing it with the conventional method.

Page:  1 | 2 | Next >>

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 10/27/2009

Related Links
 border=
From Healthscout's partner site on breast cancer, MyBreastCancerNetwork.com
VIDEO: Chemo booster cuts treatment time by two months
SYMPTOMS: Learn what to look for and what the symptoms mean
PROGNOSIS: Early detection and new treatments improve survival rates





SOURCES: Albertus G. Siebers, M.Sc., Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Mark Schiffman, M.D., M.P.H., U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md.; Oct. 28, 2009, Journal of the American Medical Association


About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001-2009. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy: Updated as of April 1, 2009  Terms of Service   Site Map
Advertising Policy