Virtual Colonoscopy a Good Bet for Elderly

Screening appears to be safe, effective for older people, study finds

Related Encyclopedia • Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Brain Metastases • Basal Cell Carcinoma • Bladder Cancer • Bone Cancer More... Related Healthscout Videos Growing Lungs in the Lab: Medicine's Next Big Thing? From Belly to Breast: Rebuilding After Cancer Shaving off Cancer Fluorescent Medicine for Brain Tumors More... Related Animations • Breast Self-Exam Video • Colon Cancer More... Related Drug Information • Epogen • Iressa • Procrit • Topamax More... Related News Articles • Damage of 'False-Positive' Mammograms Overlooked: Study • Smoking Scenes in Movies Light Up Smokers' Brains • Gene Test Might Predict Colon Cancer's Return • Breast Cancer Radiation Before 1984 Tied to Heart Disease More...

THURSDAY, Jan. 28 (HealthDay News) -- Virtual colonoscopy is a safe and effective way to screen older patients for colorectal cancer, a new study indicates.

Researchers looked at the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) in 577 patients aged 65 to 79 and found it an effective way to screen for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. It produces low referral-for-colonoscopy rates that are similar to other screening tests covered by Medicare, and doesn't result in unreasonable levels of additional testing because of extracolonic findings, they noted.

Text Continues Below

---

"There have been questions raised that factors such as the [colonoscopy] referral rate and extracolonic work-up rates would be too high in an older population for CTC to be a cost-effective, frontline colorectal cancer screening exam. Our results suggest otherwise and that these rates remain in a reasonable range," principal investigator Dr. David H. Kim, an associate professor of radiology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, said in a news release.

Among the findings:

• Advanced neoplasia (abnormal growth) was detected in 7.6 percent (44 of 577) of patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the older patients and the general screening population in terms of the characteristics of advanced neoplasia. This indicates the accuracy is similar to that shown in studies involving younger patients.
• The overall referral rate to optical colonoscopy was 15.3 percent (88 of 577), which is slightly lower than other Medicare-covered colorectal cancer screening exams such as flexible sigmoidoscopy.
• Potentially significant extracolonic findings were seen in 15.4 percent (89 of 577) of patients, with a work-up rate of 7.8 percent (45) of patients. Most of the extracolonic diagnoses were vascular aneurysms.
• No major complications, such as colon perforations, occurred.

Page:  1 | 2 | Next >>

-- Robert Preidt