Study Questions Efficacy of Popular Forehead Thermometer

Company officials say findings skewed by improper use of product

By Jeffrey Perkel
HealthDay Reporter

Related Healthscout Videos Hospitals Going High-Tech Video Interview: Dr. Atul Gawande on the Role of Patients in Improving Medical Care Closing Holes In Kids' Hearts Beat The Bean Counters More... Related News Articles • Cancer Care Unaffected by Doctor Reimbursement Changes • Barcode Technology Flaws Put Some Patients at Risk • Two-Drug Treatment Didn't Improve Cardiac Arrest Survival Rates • Lung Infections Cost Hospitals More Than $10B in 2006 More...

FRIDAY, July 13 (HealthDay News) -- A new study is calling into question a widely used, noninvasive method of taking an individual's temperature, but company officials claim the findings were skewed by improper use of the product.

Craig Crandall, a research scientist at the Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, and his colleagues used a body suit filled with hot water to induce heat stress in 16 individuals, 11 of whom were female. They then measured each subject's temperature using both a temporal thermometer made by Exergen Corp., of Watertown, Mass., and an "ingestible pill telemetry system."

Text Continues Below

---

A temporal thermometer computes the core body temperature based on forehead temperature, as measured with an infrared scanner. An ingestible pill telemetry system uses a pill-sized device that is swallowed and transmits, from inside the body, a radio signal that correlates to core body temperature.

Crandall's team found that forehead readings were unreliable indicators of core body temperature. Though the two devices reported the same temperature at the start of the experiment, as the subjects' core body temperature (as measured by the ingestible pill) rose, the temporal thermometer readings actually fell. At 50 minutes, for instance, the internally measured temperature had risen about 0.7 degrees C, on average, while the temporal thermometer reported a decrease of about 0.3 degrees C.

The study is published in the July issue of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

The temporal thermometer "is no better" than the tried-and-true parental method of feeling a child's forehead, concluded Crandall. In fact, "putting your hand on the forehead, in my opinion, is better, because we know the subject is hot, whereas this device actually said a patient was cooling down. So, the hand could actually be more accurate."

Page:  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >>