Search
Powered By HealthLine
Special Offers
Health Tools
 Heart Healthy Diet
 Ideal Body Weight Calculator
 Diet Reviews
 Fitness and Family
 Quiz: Test Your Fitness IQ
 Exercise and Fitness Guide
 Eat Out Smart
 Healthy Cooking
 BMI Calculator
Featured Conditions
 Diet & Exercise
 Stop Smoking
 Food & Fitness
 High Blood Pressure
 Cholesterol
 Heart
Resources
Healthscout News
3D Health Animations
Health Videos
Quizzes & Tools
Health Encyclopedia
Library & Communities
News Archive
Drug Library
Find a Therapist
Enter City or Zip Code:
Powered by Psychology Today



Channels
Home |  Today | Women| Men| Kids| Seniors| Diseases| Addictions| Sex & Relationships| Diet, Fitness, Looks| Alternative Medicine| Drug Checker
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Bone Therapy May Not Always Need Monitoring

In older women, annual measurements are unnecessary, study finds


Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Amenorrhea
Amniocentesis
Amniocentesis and CVS
Animal Bites
More...

Related Healthscout Videos
 border=
Custom Ankle Replacements
Optimistic Healing
Early Babies: How Soon is Too Soon?
Replacing Worn Out Wrists
More...

Related Animations
 border=
Breast Reduction
Breast Self-Exam Video
Erectile Dysfunction
Facelift
More...

Related Drug Information
 border=
Actonel
Detrol LA
Diflucan
Ditropan XL
More...

Related News Articles
 border=
Focusing on School Could Prevent Teen Pregnancies
Low Vitamin D Tied to Estrogen Decline
Caring Through Sharing -- Life Changing Stories
Hip Fracture Risk in Women Increases With Age
More...

WEDNESDAY, June 24 (HealthDay News) -- Monitoring bone density in older women after they've started taking drugs to prevent osteoporosis is unnecessary and could be potentially misleading, researchers say.

In the study, Australian researchers analyzed data from a large randomized trial that compared the effects of the drug alendronate (a widely used bisphosphonate) in more than 6,000 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, which is a risk factor for fractures.

Text Continues Below



The women's bone density was measured at the start of the study and again one, two and three years later. After three years of treatment, 97.5 percent of the women who took the drug showed at least a modest increase in bone density, and there was little variation in the treatment effect between individuals, the researchers found.

The findings, which appear online June 24 in BMJ, suggest that monitoring a person's response during the first three years of the treatment is unnecessary and, because of the potential to mislead, should not be done, concluded the researchers, from the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney.

The results support the case against routine monitoring during the early years of treatment, according to an accompanying editorial by Juliet Compston, professor of bone medicine at the University of Cambridge, in England. She said that when changes in bone mineral density are used to monitor treatment, people may be given inappropriate advice.

"Routine monitoring of bone mineral density during the first few years of antiresorptive treatment cannot be justified because it may mislead patients, lead to inappropriate management decisions and waste scarce health care resources," she concluded.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases offers tips on bone health for life.



-- Robert Preidt

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 6/24/2009

Related Links
 border=
From Healthscout's partner site on diet & exercise, MyDietExercise.com
QUIZ: What's your ideal body weight?
QUIZ: Check your body mass index (BMI) online!
QUIZ: Rate your carbohydrate intake





SOURCE: BMJ, news release, June 23, 2009


About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001-2009. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy: Updated as of April 1, 2009  Terms of Service    
Advertising Policy